What I have the feeling, that the WT is doing, is what it always does.
- Says as much as it can, on as many points possible
- The WT wants quotes.....
- Can they pick the 'testimony' apart 10 years later and quote it?
- "Oh, and Dr. Applewhite agreed that....."
- "Notice that we quoted Dr. F"? We have psychologists behind us! (by the way, I am going to look Dr F up (haha) and see just what he is all about! Why is he so important to them? )
I think they are trying to be creative. They can go back to the borganization and say:
- "We were way ahead of our time."
- "Dr A says that we are concerned with families"
- "No other religious group was printing warnings and articles like we were"
THAT is why they ignore the judge and repeat, repeat, repeat. They are mining for the perfect quote!